Shared Top Border

They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?

  WebTSPDT

[ Home ] [ Directors A-L ] [ Directors M-Z ] [ 1,000 Greatest Films ] [ 21st Century ] [ Film Noir ] [ Ain't Nobody's Blues ] [ Recommended Viewing ] [ About ] [ Links ]
 
         
 
Sergei Eisenstein
Director / Screenwriter / Editor
1898 - 1948 
Born January 23, Riga, Russia
Key Production Country: USSR
Key Genres: Propaganda Film, Historical Film, Historical Epic, Political Drama, Biography, Drama
Key Collaborators: Eduard Tisse (Cinematographer), Nikolai Cherkasov (Leading Player), Grigori Alexandrov (Screenwriter/Director), Sergei Prokofiev (Composer), Vasili Rakhals (Production Designer), Andrei Abrikosov (Character Player), Alexander Antonov (Leading Player), Serafima Birman (Leading Player), Andrei Moskvin (Cinematographer), Esfir Tobak (Editor)

Recommended: Strike (1924)*, Battleship Potemkin (1925)*, The General Line (1929), Que viva Mexico! (1932)*, Alexander Nevsky (1938)*, Ivan the Terrible, Part Two (1946)*
Worth a Look: October (1927)*, Bezhin Meadow (1937), Ivan the Terrible, Part One (1944)*
* Listed in TSPDT's 1,000 Greatest Films section.

 
 
 
Links: [ Amazon ] [ IMDB ] [ TCMDB ] [ All-Movie Guide ] [ Senses of Cinema: Great Directors ] [ Film Reference ] [ Sergei Mikhailovich Eisenstein ] [ Russian Archives Online ] [ World Socialist Web Site Profile ] [ Off Screen Article (2007) ] [ Film International Article (2008) ]
Books: [ Film Form: Essays in Film Theory ] [ The Eisenstein Reader ] [ Eisenstein at 100: A Reconsideration ] [ The Film Sense ] [ Sergei Eisenstein: A Biography ] [ Sergei Eisenstein: A Life in Conflict ] [ Beyond the Stars: The Memoirs of Sergei Eisenstein ]
 
Alexander Nevsky (1938)Strike (1924)Battleship Potemkin (1925)Ivan the Terrible, Part Two (1946)
 
     
  "Compared with the abiding influence on cinema of Renoir, Murnau or Fritz Lang, it is no longer possible to view Eisenstein as the man who laid down the theoretical basis of the medium - the British Film Institute once had that as part of a trilogy, with Griffith supplying the alphabet and Chaplin the humanity. It is true that early Eisenstein is a stirring propagandist: in those first four films, the identification with Soviet ideals and myths is based on concrete realization. But the argument of those films is often foolish and ultimately, inhumane." - David Thomson (The New Biographical Dictionary of Film, 2002)  
     
  "Eisenstein's achievements are impressive and ambitious, but finally limited: as he discovered in his later years, montage, though interesting in theory, was too cerebral and repetitive a method in practice, while, for all the Revolution's initial devotion to the people, his films too often emerge as cold, soulless propaganda." - Geoff Andrew (The Film Handbook, 1989)  
     
  "That the Russian Sergei Mikhailovitch Eisenstein was a genius at the art of montage is indisputable. Whether he was also a genius of the cinema, in the manner of his compatriot Dovzhenko, is more open to doubt... If his films sometimes lack the human touch, he remains a master of the organization of images within the frame in such a way as to make the maximum impact on his audience." - David Quinlan (Quinlan's Film Directors, 1999)  
     
  "The master of montage, Eisenstein created a series of classic Soviet films which speak of the faith, optimism, and willpower of the Russian people." - William R. Meyer (The Film Buff's Catalog, 1978)  
     
  "Now why should the cinema follow the forms of theater and painting rather than the methodology of language, which allows wholly new concepts of ideas to arise from the combination of two concrete denotations of two concrete objects?" - Sergei Eisenstein  
     
 
Please note that the rating given for this director (see top-right) is based only on the films we have seen (listed above). Films by this director that we haven't seen include Time in the Sun (1940).
 7
 

"I am radically opposed to the way Eisenstein used the frame to codify intellectual formulae. My own method of conveying experience to the audience is quite different. Of course it has to be said that Eisenstein wasn't trying to convey his own experience to anyone, he wanted to put across ideas, purely and simply; but for me that sort of cinema is utterly inimical. Moreover Eisenstein's montage dictum, as I see it, contradicts the very basis of the unique process whereby a film affects an audience. It deprives the person watching of that prerogative of film, which has to do with what distinguishes its impact on his consciousness from that of literature or philosophy: namely the opportunity to live through what is happening on the screen as if it were his own life, to take over, as deeply personal and his own, the experience imprinted in time upon the screen, relating his own life to what is being shown." - Andrei Tarkovsky, Sculpting in Time

 
 
Top 250 Directors
Fringe Benefits
100 Essential Directors (Pop Matters)
The 7th Most Influential Director of All Time (2002 MovieMaker Poll)
Robin Buss' Top 10 Directors
501 Movie Directors: A Comprehensive Guide to the Greatest Filmmakers
 
See Also
Grigory Alexandrov (External Link)
Sergei Bondarchuk
Alexander Dovzhenko
Grigori Kozintsev (External Link)
Vsevolod Pudovkin
Walter Ruttmann
Andrei Tarkovsky
Dziga Vertov
 
 
 
         
         

 

[ Home ] [ Directors A-L ] [ Directors M-Z ] [ 1,000 Greatest Films ] [ 21st Century ] [ Film Noir ] [ Ain't Nobody's Blues ] [ Recommended Viewing ] [ About ] [ Links ]
[ Recommended Reading Archives ] [ The Shooting Gallery ]
 
Contact Us: bill@theyshootpictures.com.
©2002-2011 They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?